Saturday, 20 April, 2024
HomeEpidemiologyIs altitude linked to metabolic syndrome risk?

Is altitude linked to metabolic syndrome risk?

People living between 457-2,297m, had a lower risk of developing metabolic syndrome than those living at sea level (0-121m, found a Spanish prospective cohort study.

Could something as simple as the geographic area in which you live contribute to your risk of developing heart disease and diabetes, or suffering a stroke? A study has revealed that the incidence of metabolic syndrome could be linked to the altitude of where a person lives. Metabolic syndrome is the medical term for the combination of high blood pressure, sugar and cholesterol levels, as well as excess body fat around the waist, and contributes to serious health problems.

"We found that those people living between 457 metres to 2,297 metres, had a lower risk of developing metabolic syndrome than those living at sea level (0 to 121 metres),"says Amaya López-Pascual, who conducted this research as part of her PhD thesis in the department of nutrition, food science and physiology and the Centre for Nutrition Research of the University of Navarra, Spain.

"Unfortunately, metabolic syndrome is very common and increasing worldwide. For example, 34% of the US population suffers metabolic syndrome. Our research will help us to understand what factors contribute to its development," explains López-Pascual.

This new research is the first to assess the link between living at high altitudes and the risk to initially healthy people developing all the criteria that make up the metabolic syndrome.

While the reported increase in the metabolic syndrome is principally blamed on higher obesity rates, smoking and increasingly inactive lifestyles, less is known about the effect our environment may have on us. Previous studies have suggested that people living at higher altitudes, where the body has to work harder to get the oxygen it needs, have noticeably fewer problems linked to the metabolic syndrome.

"Living or training at high altitudes or under a simulated hypoxic (oxygen deficient) environment seems to help with heart and lung function, losing weight, and improves insulin sensitivity," explains Pedro González-Muniesa, associate professor at the University of Navarra and co-senior author of this study, who is also a member of the CIBERobn consortium and IDISNA (Navarra's Health Research Institute), Spain.

The researchers used data from the Spanish SUN project, where participants have been voluntarily submitting information about their health twice-yearly since 1999. Information from thousands of initially healthy participants were used to investigate the development of metabolic syndrome in relation to the altitude of where they lived.

The results were quite clear – the higher the altitude, the less likely you were of developing metabolic syndrome. Interestingly, using information about the participants' family history, the researchers could also assess if those more prone to this health problem also saw these benefits. "We found our results were independent of the genetic background of the individuals," reveals González-Muniesa.

While the findings of the study appear simple, there were lots of factors to consider and the limitations of the study have been highlighted by the authors. For instance, the self-reporting of data can suffer problems, whereby people over-report more socially acceptable information.

"While we tried to account for influences that may have impacted our results, there are a number of factors to consider. All the participants were graduate students, implying they have a higher educational level than the general population. While they have been shown to be better at self-reporting data, they typically have a different diet and levels of physical activity. These results should only be applied to people with similar lifestyles," explains J Alfredo Martínez, professor at the University of Navarra and the other co-senior author of this study, also a member Navarra's Health Research Institute.

"We assumed participants remained living at the same altitude and at present, we do not know the influence that humidity, temperature, climate and pollution may have at various levels of altitude. However, we do know the participants were recruited from a range of locations at all altitudes, so any effects from being in a city or countryside were spread over all the participants we studied," further explains López-Pascual.

It is hoped this research will open up new avenues for understanding the health benefits of high altitude living. "Our group considers studying the health benefits of hypoxia a very promising area of research," says González-Muniesa. "We need more studies to understand the mechanisms involved. In addition, we can start to look at the altitude at which we start to obtain benefits and where they stop and/or turn harmful."

Abstract

Living in a geographically higher altitude affects oxygen availability. The possible connection between environmental factors and the development of metabolic syndrome (MetS) feature is not fully understood, being the available epidemiological evidence still very limited. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the longitudinal association between altitude and incidence of MetS and each of its components in a prospective Spanish cohort, The Seguimiento Universidad de Navarra (SUN) project. Our study included 6860 highly educated subjects (university graduates) free from any MetS criteria at baseline. The altitude of residence was imputed with the postal code of each individual subject residence according to the data of the Spanish National Cartographic Institute and participants were categorized into tertiles. MetS was defined according to the harmonized definition. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the association between the altitude of residence and the risk of MetS during follow-up. After a median follow-up period of 10 years, 462 incident cases of MetS were identified. When adjusting for potential confounders, subjects in the highest category of altitude (>456 m) exhibited a significantly lower risk of developing MetS compared to those in the lowest tertile (

Authors
Amaya Lopez-Pascual, Maira Bes-Rastrollo, Carmen Sayón-Orea, Aurora Perez-Cornago, Jesús Díaz-Gutiérrez, Juan J Pons, Miguel A Martínez-González, Pedro González-Muniesa, J Alfredo Martínez

[link url="https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/01/170130133406.htm"]Frontiers material[/link]
[link url="http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fphys.2016.00658/full"]Frontiers in Physiology abstract[/link]

MedicalBrief — our free weekly e-newsletter

We'd appreciate as much information as possible, however only an email address is required.