Twin birth defect risk may be higher when no fertility treatment

Organisation: Position: Deadline Date: Location:

The risk of birth defects among twins may be higher among mums who haven’t used fertility treatment – which is known to increase the chances of a twin birth – than among those who have used it, finds US research.

The rate of twin births in the US rose by 75% between 1980 and 2011, and it is thought that fertility treatment may help explain this increase. But it is not clear whether fertility treatment might itself be linked to the higher rate of birth defects seen among twins, as previous studies have not always included information on its use.

In an effort to clarify the associations between twins and their higher rate of birth defects, the researchers that included Dr Sarah Tinker at the US Department of Health and Human Services and Dr Denise J Jamieson, at the women’s health and fertility branch at the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, mined data from the National Birth Defects Prevention Study (NBDPS) – a major population based, case control study of major birth abnormalities in the US. They included mums of singletons and twins with no major birth defects (comparison group), born between October 1997 and December 2007, as well as cases of major birth abnormalities drawn from stillbirths, pregnancy terminations, and live births during the same timeframe. Just under 3% (227) of the mums in the comparison group had twins compared with just under 6% (1250) of the mums in the birth defect group.

In both groups, mothers of twins were more likely to be older than 29, of white ethnicity, to be more highly educated, and to have taken folic acid before and around pregnancy than the mothers of singletons. Use of fertility treatment was also more common among twin pregnancies than it was among singleton pregnancies both for mums in the comparison group (32.5% vs just over 3%, respectively) and for mums in the birth defect group (29% vs 4%, respectively).

Among the mums who didn’t use fertility treatment, twinning was associated with 29 out of 45 different types of birth defect, with the strongest associations seen for multiple ventricular septal abnormalities (defects in the wall dividing the left and right chambers of the heart) and cloacal exstrophy, where the abdominal organs are exposed.

Among the mothers who did use fertility treatment, twinning was associated with five out of 25 different types of birth defect, with the strongest associations found for hypoplastic left heart syndrome, an abnormality that affects normal blood flow through the heart, and omphalocele (a hernia that pushes the abdominal organs into the umbilical cord).

The risk of birth defects was higher among identical (monozygotic), than among non-identical (dizygotic), twins.

This is an observational study so no firm conclusions can be drawn about cause and effect, and the researchers caution that the number of mothers in the group not using fertility treatment was small, added to which, around 30% of eligible mothers didn’t take part in the NBDPS study.

“Explanations for the observed associations between twinning and birth defects are not clear, although our results suggest that there may be differences depending on use of fertility treatment, zygosity of twins, and the birth defect being considered,” they write.

They speculate that the reasons for the associations found might lie in a common cause, particularly among identical twins, or in the consequences of twinning itself, which might include crowding, insufficient nutrient supply, and problems with blood flow between the two foetuses. Less than optimal fertility, associated with obesity or older age, may also have a role, they suggest.

Abstract
Background: Twinning has been associated with many types of birth defects, although previous studies have had inconsistent findings. Many studies lack information about potential confounders, particularly use of fertility treatment. Our objective was to assess the association between twinning and birth defects in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study (NBDPS).
Methods: We used data from the NBDPS, a population-based, case–control study of major birth defects in the USA, to evaluate associations between twinning and birth defects. The study population included mothers of twin and singleton controls (live-born infants without major birth defects), and cases (fetuses or infants with a major birth defect) born October 1997–December 2007. Adjusted ORs and 95% CIs were estimated using multivariable logistic regression stratified by use of fertility treatment. Twin sex-pairing data and a simulation approach were used to estimate the zygosity of twins.
Results: In the unassisted conception stratum, we observed significant positive associations between twinning and 29 of 45 defect groups. The largest effect estimates were observed for multiple ventricular septal defects and cloacal exstrophy. Among mothers reporting any use of fertility treatments, we observed a significant association with twinning for 5 of 25 defect groups, with the largest effect estimates for hypoplastic left heart syndrome and omphalocele. OR estimates in the estimated monozygotic stratum were generally further from the null than in the dizygotic stratum.
Conclusions: Compared with singletons, a wide rangeof birth defects are significantly more common among twins. Birth defect risk in twins may be differential by use of fertility treatment.

Authors
April L Dawson, Sarah C Tinker, Denise J Jamieson, Charlotte A Hobbs, R J Berry, Sonja A Rasmussen, Marlene Anderka, Kim M Keppler-Noreuil, Angela E Lin, Jennita Reefhuis

BMJ material
Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health abstract


Receive Medical Brief's free weekly e-newsletter



Related Posts

Thank you for subscribing to MedicalBrief


MedicalBrief is Africa’s premier medical news and research weekly newsletter. MedicalBrief is published every Thursday and delivered free of charge by email to over 33 000 health professionals.

Please consider completing the form below. The information you supply is optional and will only be used to compile a demographic profile of our subscribers. Your personal details will never be shared with a third party.


Thank you for taking the time to complete the form.