Greater risk of toxic shock syndrome from menstrual cups

Organisation: Position: Deadline Date: Location:

Toxic shock syndrome (TSS) has long-been associated with tampon use, but a study claims that menstrual cups could pose an even greater risk. The Independent reports that favoured for their economical and eco-friendly properties, menstrual cups have risen in popularity in recent years and are viewed by many as an ethical and more hygienic alternative to more traditional sanitary products, such as towels and tampons. However, the study claims that a common infectious bacteria linked to TSS can remain on the cup, regardless of model or composition, even after being washed as advised.

Conducted in Lyon, France, the report says researchers examined the material of 15 different tampons and menstrual cups to see which might increase bacterial growth or infections that lead to TSS. The results showed that menstrual cups pose a risk to TSS because of the air that suddenly surrounds the vagina when the device is inserted, which the study’s authors claim might favour the growth of staphylococcus aureus, a common infectious bacteria associated with the rare condition.

This is due to the shape and volume of the cup which results in an increased aeration in the vagina that can promote bacteria growth.

The report says the study also revealed that even after the menstrual cup was washed three times, a substantial amount of staphylococcus aureus remained eight hours later. “Manual instructions of menstrual cup indicate that the cup could be removed, emptied, and rinsed with tap water before being re-inserted, but our results suggest that women may reinsert a contaminated cup when following this advice,” the study reads.

This could be because staphylococcus aureus forms a compact biofilm when it comes into contact with a menstrual cup and can subsequently become resistant to basic water washes.

So as to avoid contamination, the authors advised menstrual cup users to invest in a second cup to allow for sterilisation in between uses by placing the used cup in boiling water.

Researchers also noticed a “slight increase” of staphylococcus aureus and toxin production in menstrual cups compared to tampons due to the increase of air predicated by menstrual cup insertion. Using a smaller cup could limit this risk, they advised.

“Tampon use continues to be associated with menstrual toxic shock syndrome, and a case of menstrual TSS has been described associated with a menstrual cup,” said Dr Gerard Lina, professor of microbiology at University Claude Bernard in Lyon. However, it’s worth noting that the sanitary products were tested in a lab rather than on real women and therefore further research could be required in order to fully establish the risks.

The study also found that despite claims, tampons composed purely of cotton are not necessarily safer than those made from mixed materials. “Our results did not support the hypothesis suggesting that tampons composed exclusively of organic cotton could be intrinsically safer than those made of mixed cotton and rayon, or viscose or tampons composed entirely of viscose,” added Lina.

The report says toxic shock syndrome is a rare but potentially life-threatening disease often associated with tampon use in young women, however, it can occur at any age and become fatal if not promptly treated. Symptoms can include a high fever, diarrhoea, the whites of the eyes turning red and breathing difficulties.

If TSS is caught early, it is fairly straightforward to treat and most sufferers are likely to make a full recovery.

Abstract
Fifteen currently marketed intravaginal protection products (11 types of tampon and four menstrual cups) were tested by the modified tampon sac method to determine their effect on Staphylococcus aureus growth and toxic shock toxin 1 (TSST-1) production. Most tampons reduced S. aureus growth and TSST-1 production, with differences based on brand and composition, and S. aureusgrowth was higher in de-structured than in unaltered tampons. We observed higher S. aureus growth and toxin production in menstrual cups than in tampons, potentially due to the additional air introduced to the bag by cups, with differences based on cup composition and size.

Authors
Louis Nonfoux, Myriam Chiaruzzi, Cédric Badiou, Jessica Baude, Anne Tristan, Jean Thioulouse, Daniel Muller, Claire Prigent Combaret, Gérard Lina

The Independent report
Applied and Environmental Biology abstract


Receive Medical Brief's free weekly e-newsletter



Related Posts

Thank you for subscribing to MedicalBrief


MedicalBrief is Africa’s premier medical news and research weekly newsletter. MedicalBrief is published every Thursday and delivered free of charge by email to over 33 000 health professionals.

Please consider completing the form below. The information you supply is optional and will only be used to compile a demographic profile of our subscribers. Your personal details will never be shared with a third party.


Thank you for taking the time to complete the form.