How good is the now trendy Intermittent Fasting diet?

Organisation: Position: Deadline Date: Location:

The popular Intermittent Fasting (IF) diet regimen can work well for weight loss, but many other claims about its benefits remain to be proved, writes Claudia Wallis in Scientific American.

Healthy weight management comes with many perks. Among the proven benefits: a reduced risk of diabetes, less joint pain, lower chances of certain cancers and an overall fitter cardiovascular system. Some regimens, particularly the Mediterranean diet, seem especially well suited to delivering these advantages, though, as with all diets, only to the degree that people can stick with them and avoid overeating.

Now research hints that another trendy diet may offer even more extensive health benefits. At least that is the claim by some who study an approach to eating—and not eating—called intermittent fasting.

Intermittent fasting (IF) has its roots in decades of studies showing that if you feed rodents only every other day, they not only remain lean but develop fewer aging-related diseases and live 30% to 40% longer.

In a 2019 review article, gerontologist Rafael de Cabo of the National Institute on Aging and neuroscientist Mark Mattson of Johns Hopkins University summarised a wealth of findings in animals and a more limited number in people. In rodents and to some degree in monkeys, IF is a veritable fountain of youth, lowering body weight, blood pressure and cholesterol levels, improving glucose control, reducing systemic inflammation, maintaining brain health, and even boosting endurance and coordination.

In humans, studies have shown that various forms of IF can be effective ways to lose weight, control blood sugar and lower blood pressure. There are hints that the more stringent forms – those with longer or stricter fasts – offer additional benefits. “But to be honest, a lot of the benefits that we see in animals are not really translating to humans,” says Krista Varady, a professor of nutrition at the University of Illinois at Chicago. “It’s not a magic diet.”

IF comes in three main flavours: alternate-day fasting, when people alternate between feast days (eating normally or a little extra) and fast days with one meagre meal of about 500 calories; the 5:2 plan, which means eating normally five days a week but only one scant meal the other two days; and time-restricted eating, when daily dining is confined to a window of eight hours (or, in some versions, six or 10 hours).

Scientists attribute many of the positive effects of IF to something called metabolic switching – after 10 or 12 hours of fasting, the body depletes its supply of glycogen (a stored form of glucose) and starts burning ketones (a fuel made from fat by the liver). This switch affects growth factors, immune signals and other chemicals. “But ketones are not the whole story,” Mattson says. “These periods of fasting-eating-fasting-eating activate genes and signalling pathways that make neurons more resilient,” he says, mainly based on animal research. “It stimulates a process called autophagy: the cells go into a stress-resistance and recycling mode where they get rid of damaged proteins.” Mattson likens cycles of fasting and eating to exercise and rest: “Your muscles don’t get bigger during exercise; they get bigger during the recovery.”

There is good evidence that IF helps people shed pounds. For example, two studies, each with about 100 overweight women, compared the 5:2 regimen with a diet that cut daily calories by 25%; both found that the two diets led to the same amount of weight loss over three to six months. The intermittent fasters, however, wound up with better blood sugar control and a greater reduction in body fat.

In addition, a 2019 study by Varady’s team with 43 overweight people showed that alternate-day fasting improved the body’s response to insulin by more than twice as much as a typical calorie-cutting diet.

IF may also have an edge in reducing blood pressure, says Courtney Peterson, assistant professor of nutrition at the University of Alabama at Birmingham. In a small but rigorous study with pre-diabetic men, Peterson’s laboratory showed that restricting meals to a six-hour window that ended at 3 P.M. led to better insulin sensitivity and blood pressure even without weight loss. As for other benefits, dozens of human trials are underway to test IF as a way to slow cancer growth and reduce symptoms of multiple sclerosis, stroke, Crohn’s disease and other illnesses.

In the end, the only successful diets – whatever the goal – involve permanent changes in eating habits. IF can work well over the long haul for meal skippers and people who hate to count calories. But Varady saw a high dropout rate in a yearlong study of alternate-day fasting and is sceptical of time-restriction windows that shut too early: “Nobody wants to skip dinner.”


Full Scientific American report


NEMJ 2019 review article


University of Illinois at Chicago study


University of Alabama study



See also

Intermittent fasting may help people live longer


Intermittent fasting: From Pythagoras to Fung


The pros and cons of intermittent fasting to lose weight


Mediterranean, fasting & Paleo diets go head-to-head Down Under


Daily fasting helps control weight and lower BP


NHS scepticism over study claiming heart benefits of fasting diet


Pilot study: Time-restricted feeding may reduce body fat


Alternate day fasting could be a simpler way to diet

Receive Medical Brief's free weekly e-newsletter

Related Posts

Thank you for subscribing to MedicalBrief

MedicalBrief is Africa’s premier medical news and research weekly newsletter. MedicalBrief is published every Thursday and delivered free of charge by email to over 33 000 health professionals.

Please consider completing the form below. The information you supply is optional and will only be used to compile a demographic profile of our subscribers. Your personal details will never be shared with a third party.

Thank you for taking the time to complete the form.