UK court rejects bid for assisted death

Organisation: Position: Deadline Date: Location:
Conway

Noel Conway

A terminally ill man in the UK has lost his High Court challenge against the law on assisted dying. BBC News reports that Noel Conway, 67, from Shrewsbury, who has motor neurone disease, wanted a doctor to be allowed to prescribe a lethal dose when his health deteriorates. His lawyers had argued he faced a stark choice, which was unfair and the law needed to change. They said he could either bring about his own death while still physically able to do so, or await death with no control over how and when it came.

According to the report, he had previously said he wanted to say goodbye to loved ones “at the right time, not to be in a zombie-like condition suffering both physically and psychologically”. He argued that when he had less than six months to live and retained the mental capacity to make the decision, he wished to be able to enlist assistance from the medical profession to bring about a “peaceful and dignified” death.

Currently any doctor helping him to die would face up to 14 years in prison.

The report says Conway, who was not at London’s High Court, wanted a declaration that the Suicide Act 1961, which lays out the law on assisted dying, is incompatible with article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. This relates to respect for private and family life, and article 14, which protects from discrimination. But Lord Justice Sales, Mrs Justice Whipple and Mr Justice Garnham rejected his case.

Conway, who has been supported by campaign group Dignity in Dying, said he was “deeply disappointed” by the judgment and intends to appeal it. “The experiences of those who are terminally ill need to be heard. As I approach the end of my life, I face unbearable suffering and the possibility of a traumatic, drawn-out death.”

But Peter Saunders, from the Care Not Killing Alliance, said in the report that the decision was right “because of the concern that vulnerable people might be exploited or abused by those who have a financial or emotional interest”.

The report says it is not the first time the law has been challenged. A case brought by Tony Nicklinson – who was paralysed after a stroke – was dismissed in 2014 by the Supreme Court, which stated it was important that Parliament debated the issues before any decision was made by the courts.

In 2015 MPs rejected proposals to allow assisted dying in England and Wales, in their first vote on the issue in almost 20 years. Supporters of the current legislation say it exists to protect the weak and vulnerable from being exploited or coerced. The report says Conway’s case is different from Nicklinson’s in that he has a terminal illness and his legal team set out strict criteria and clear potential safeguards to protect vulnerable people from any abuse of the system.

BBC News report
Judgment


Receive Medical Brief's free weekly e-newsletter



Related Posts

Thank you for subscribing to MedicalBrief


MedicalBrief is Africa’s premier medical news and research weekly newsletter. MedicalBrief is published every Thursday and delivered free of charge by email to over 33 000 health professionals.

Please consider completing the form below. The information you supply is optional and will only be used to compile a demographic profile of our subscribers. Your personal details will never be shared with a third party.


Thank you for taking the time to complete the form.