More than 450 patients died after being given powerful painkillers inappropriately at Gosport War Memorial Hospital, BBC News reports that an inquiry has found. An independent panel said, taking into account missing records, a further 200 patients may have suffered a similar fate. The inquiry found there was a “disregard for human life” of a large number of patients from 1989 to 2000.
It said Dr Jane Barton oversaw the practice of prescribing on the wards. There was an “institutionalised regime” of prescribing and administering “dangerous” amounts of a medication not clinically justified at the Hampshire hospital, the panel said.
The report says Prime Minister Theresa May described events at Gosport as “deeply troubling” and apologised to families over the time it took to get answers from the National Health Service (NHS). Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt told MPs that police and the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) would examine material in the report to consider their next steps and “whether criminal charges should now be brought”.
Bridget Reeves – whose grandmother Elsie Divine, 88, died at the hospital in 1999 – said: “These horrifying, shameful, unforgivable actions need to be disclosed in a criminal court for a jury to decide and only then can we put our loved ones to rest.”
The report says so far, the only person to face disciplinary action has been Barton, who was found guilty of failings in her care of 12 patients at Gosport between 1996 and 1999. But no prosecutions were brought and she was not struck off the medical register, choosing to retire after the findings
Former Bishop of Liverpool James Jones, who led the Gosport Independent Panel, said: “The documents seen by the panel show that for a 12-year period a clinical assistant, Dr Barton, was responsible for the practice of prescribing which prevailed on the wards.
“Although the consultants were not involved directly in treating patients on the wards, the medical records show that they were aware of how drugs were prescribed and administered but did not intervene to stop the practice.”
Relatives had said they hoped the findings of the report would end their “harrowing” wait for answers. The document said families were “consistently let down” by those in authority, both medical individuals and institutions, when they complained about the treatment of their loved ones. Bishop Jones, who also headed the Hillsborough inquiry, said: “It’s not for the panel to ascribe criminal or civil liability. It will be for any future judicial processes to determine whatever culpability and criticism might be forthcoming.”
The report says police previously investigated the deaths of 92 patients during three inquires between 1998 and 2006, but no prosecutions were brought. Chief Constable Olivia Pinkney, of Hampshire Constabulary, said the force had “co-operated fully” with the panel and “shared with them more than 25,000 documents containing 100,000 pages of information”. “We will assess any new information contained within the report in conjunction with our partners in health and the CPS in order to decide the next steps,” she added.
The CPS said it will “consider” the documents and take “any appropriate steps as required.”
The inquiry thought an “awareness” that the deaths “might be due to ‘another Shipman'” had “cast a shadow over how concerns at the hospital were viewed”. GP Harold Shipman was jailed for life in 2000 for murdering 15 patients between 1995 and 1998.
“The police focused on the allegation that Dr Barton was guilty of unlawful killing, rather than pursuing a wider investigation,” the inquiry panel said. “Hampshire Constabulary approached Dr Barton’s managers, including the then CEO at the trust and Dr Althea Lord, the responsible consultant, in a way that ignored the possibility that they too might have been subject to investigation.”
It said the quality of the force’s three investigations was “consistently poor”. The panel found officers had a mindset of seeing family members who complained as “stirring up trouble” while seeing the hospital as the place to go for guidance and assurance during their inquiries.
The panel added: “There was an institutionalised regime of prescribing and administering ‘dangerous doses’ of a hazardous combination of medication not clinically indicated or justified, with patients and relatives powerless in their relationship with professional staff.”
Gosport MP Caroline Dinenage said in the report that it highlighted many “failures” by the authorities to properly investigate. She said organisations must look closely at the full findings and urged the government to take action if there were cases to answer.
Janet Davies, CEO of the Royal College of Nursing, said the report made for “very sober reading for everybody involved in the care of patients”. “Nursing as a profession must work hard to seek out lessons from Gosport and we expect that approach to be shared by regulators and the health and care system,” she added.
“The panel is right to praise the bravery shown by the nurses who raised concerns. It highlights how difficult it can be for nursing staff to challenge the decisions taken by others.”
The report says the health secretary described the findings as “truly shocking”. He said “brave nurse whistle blowers” had first raised concerns in 1991, as well as families. He added there had been a “catalogue of failures”, including by the Department of Health.
A report first compiled by Professor Richard Baker in 2003 – and published 10 years later – found evidence of an “almost routine use of opiates” since 1998.
The report says at the launch of the inquiry four years ago, former Care Minister Norman Lamb said it would address what he called “unanswered questions” about the care of those who died. “There has been a real systemic failure here. . . a closing of ranks in my view,” he said. The Lib Dem MP has now called for an “independent and thorough” police investigation.
Shadow Health Secretary Jonathan Ashworth said the “substantial” 370-page report would take time to absorb. “Families were too readily dismissed, it’s shameful,” he said.
Ken Woolley’s father John died at Gosport in 1996 aged 68 after being admitted for a broken hip. “As soon as we saw him the next day he was unable to communicate due to the drugs they’d given him,” he is quoted in the report as saying. “There was another 11 days where he still couldn’t communicate before he died. Something has to come of this – they have to get to the bottom of it.”
As well as hundreds of death certificates, the panel analysed documents from the police, coroners, the NHS and other organisations. The report says the panel included geriatric medicine specialist Dr Colin Currie, investigative journalist David Hencke, former Scotland Yard Commander Duncan Jarrett and pathology and medical records expert Dr Bill Kirkup.
Lamb has claimed government officials tried to dodge a public inquiry into the suspicious deaths, according to a report in The Independent. He said he suspected a “conspiracy” among officials, when in his absence they tried to reject an inquiry into hundreds of deaths allegedly linked to Barton. He claims to have intervened at the last moment, allowing the subsequent launch of the probe into circumstances around the deaths of mainly elderly patients, many of whom were prescribed high doses of morphine.
The report says Lamb, who campaigned for a public inquiry into the issue before becoming a minister, explained how, once in office, he had pushed government civil servants to show him the findings of a report by Baker into patient care. He is quoted as saying: “I started to ask questions internally. I asked to see the Professor Baker report and, for two to three months, it wasn’t forthcoming. We then went away on holiday in the summer of 2013. Late at night one evening, I just happened to switch on my iPad and I saw an email from my private secretary, which said they were going to publish the Baker report the next day, and that they would announce there would be no public inquiry. I was incandescent about this. I immediately sensed that there might have been a conspiracy to cover this up whilst I was out of the country – to this day I don’t know whether it was cock-up or cover-up.”
He emailed back saying that the announcement was not to go out, and when he returned he met officials and made it clear that there had to be an inquiry. The MP said that officials had sought the permission of another minister, who was less familiar with the case, to put out the announcement in his absence. He accepted that the civil servants may have innocently forgotten he had repeatedly requested to see the Baker report but added: “It was either grossly negligent to just proceed in that way, or there was something worse involved.”
He told of his horror at eventually reading in the Baker report how people who had gone into the hospital for rehabilitation had ended up dead after being proscribed morphine.
The report said Lamb pointed out that the facts around the case had been available to officials for some time and that he could not understand why they had never been put to an inquiry.
He argued that there had been a “systemic failure” in the health service, adding: “If you imagine what it must have been like for those families who lost loved ones in this hospital, just being left completely in the dark, a sense of a closing of ranks, an unwillingness by the NHS to face up to some really serious allegations to what happened in that hospital. “So, this report is in my view very long overdue.”
A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: “Norman Lamb, in his capacity as a minister at the Department of Health at the time, was instrumental in the decision to set up a panel investigation into the tragic events at Gosport. The government, along with local NHS organisations and authorities, will receive a copy of the report and we expect the findings to be studied closely and carefully by all relevant parties.”