The British government, the NHS and the UK General Medical Council (GMC) need to reconsider their ‘unethical’ recruitment drive of overseas medical personnel, especially from low- and middle-income nations, write two specialists in the SA Medical Journal.
Prof Johannes Fagan, chairman, division of otolaryngology, faculty of health sciences, University of Cape Town, and MF Bhutta, consultant and honorary clinical professor, department of ENT surgery, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton write:
The recent report, ‘The state of medical education and practice in the UK 2020", from the General Medical Council (GMC) reveals that in 2019, doctors who obtained their medical qualification overseas comprised nearly 35% (86,794/251,319) of all those licensed to practise in the UK, and that between July 2019 and June 2020 a further 10,000 such doctors registered – many more than those who registered with a qualification from the UK.
The UK already has one of the highest proportions and overall numbers of overseas-qualified doctors in its workforce, yet continues to actively encourage and support overseas health workers to relocate.
Current UK immigration rules recognise all medical practitioners (as well as nurses, paramedics, radiographers, occupational therapists, and speech and language therapists) as shortage occupations, and for migrants offered such a post in the National Health Service (NHS) grant a reduced visa fee and support with relocation.
In their strategy for the future, the GMC suggested that ‘overall numbers will need to rise further … likely to require a continuation of the large number of doctors from overseas joining our workforce’. This position seems insensitive to the well-documented and morally questionable problem of ‘brain drain’.
A report by the World Health Organization in 2006 found that on average a quarter of doctors in sub-Saharan Africa had migrated to work in high-income countries, and yet we know that only 5% of people in sub-Saharan Africa have access to timely, safe and affordable surgery.
Of doctors recently registered by the GMC, the largest number was from South Asia, and yet in South Asia only 3% of patients have access to surgery. Saluja et al reported that the movement of physicians from lower- to higher-income settings has substantial economic consequences that are not simply due to movement of human capital, but also due to excess mortality associated with loss of physicians.
We have previously expressed concern that as the COVID-19 pandemic makes health workforce shortages in countries such as the UK and US more apparent, migrant workers should not be used to fill the gap. However, in March 2020, the GMC expedited registration of many migrant doctors to help the NHS response to the pandemic.
As low- and middle-income countries battle COVID19 on top of a fragile health infrastructure, they need their medical workforce to stay home. When politicians and healthcare planners err by not training enough of their own healthcare personnel to care for their population, or do not create working conditions to retain staff, then they should pay the price, not patients and health systems in poorer resourced countries.
The UK government, the NHS and the GMC need to reconsider their recruitment drive of overseas medical personnel, especially from low- and middle-income nations. It is simply unethical to do so.South African Medical Journal letter