The latest hikes by the Government Employees Medical Scheme (GEMS) have come under fire from Public Service & Administration Minister Mzamo Buthelezi, who told Parliament the government would engage with GEMS trustees over the “unaffordable tariffs”, which increased 9.8% this year.
Business Day reports that while his comments suggest there may be scope for a reduction in members’ monthly contributions, it would be a highly unusual move, requiring approval from the Council for Medical Schemes.
GEMS, the country’s largest restricted medical scheme, is only available to public servants and their dependants, and is heavily subsidised by the state, which pays up to two-thirds of members’ monthly contributions.
It has been slammed by unions in recent years over its contribution hikes, which increased by a weighted average of 13.4% in 2025 and 9.8% this year.
In August, Nehawu urged GEMS to cap its 2026 contribution increase in line with consumer price inflation, which at the time the Reserve Bank projected would be 3.3% this year.
But when GEMS announced in November that it would be upping premiums by 9.8%, Nehawu said it was failing to deliver on its mandate to provide affordable medical cover for public servants.
The latest increases are higher than those imposed during the height of the Covid-19 pandemic and in its immediate aftermath, when GEMS used its accumulated reserves to limit contribution increases to just 2% in 2022 and 5% in 2023. In line with most medical schemes, Gems experienced unexpectedly low claims during the pandemic as members avoided healthcare facilities for fear of infection and deferred non-urgent care.
In a written response to questions from ANC MP Weziwe Tikana-Gxotiwe, Buthelezi said there had been “engagements” with organised labour from the Public Service Co-ordinating Bargaining Council and there were ongoing discussions about minimising the impact of its “unaffordable tariffs”.
“The GEMS board of trustees … has already made the decision for the 9.8% increase. However, the employer will engage with the employer-appointed trustees to address the impact of the unaffordable tariffs,” he said.
In a separate response to questions from ANC MP Phindisiwe Xaba-Ntshaba, the Minister said GEMS’ contributions were among the most affordable in South Africa.
“For a typical public service family, contributions are 25% lower than comparable open schemes before subsidies and 67% lower after subsidies. This equates to an average monthly saving of around R2 029 before subsidy and R4 361 after subsidy,” he said.
GEMS COO Vuyo Gqola said there were ongoing engagements between the board and the Minister to ensure the scheme remained financially viable and affordable to members.
She said annual contribution increases were driven by medical inflation, which consistently far exceeded consumer price inflation due to a growing burden of disease, higher utilisation, new technologies and fraud, waste and abuse.
“Without these adjustments, Gems cannot fulfil its mandate to provide access to comprehensive benefits, meet its obligation to pay claims, remain market competitive and (be) financially sustainable, thereby securing long-term access to healthcare for more than 2.4m beneficiaries,” she said.
See more from MedicalBrief archives:
Premium hike slammed by GEMS members
State medical aid premiums now unaffordable, claims PSA