The University of North Texas Health Science Centre has been ordered to immediately stop its practice of liquefying bodies after using them for training and research, after revelations that it had turned to alkaline hydrolysis to save money on cremating human remains.
This follows recent findings – in September – that the Centre had dissected and studied hundreds of unclaimed bodies without the consent of the dead or their families. NBC News reports that many of the bodies were cut up and leased to other schools, medical technology companies and the army, which used them to train students and doctors.
In the newest debacle, in a cease-and-desist letter on 1 November the Texas Funeral Service Commission said it had discovered, during an October inspection, that the university had been “unlawfully conducting final dispositions of human remains using alkaline hydrolysis”.
Alkaline hydrolysis, also known as water cremation, is heralded as an eco-friendly alternative to traditional cremation. It uses water, chemicals and heat to rapidly break down a body, leaving behind a liquid that can be poured down the drain and a dry, ash-like residue that can be returned to relatives.
It’s also illegal in Texas, according to the Funeral Commission.
“This practice is not authorised under Texas State law and constitutes a serious violation of the standards governing the lawful disposition of human remains,” the commission said in the letter to Health Science Centre President Sylvia Trent-Adams.
In a statement to NBC News, Health Science Centre spokesperson Andy North pointed to a section of Texas administrative code that lists alkaline hydrolysis as an option for disposing of bodies after they have been used for medical research.
But the Funeral Commission said that code was invalid and superseded by state law, which only allows for human remains to be cremated or buried. (Water cremations are legal in more than 25 other states.)
The Commission also threatened to fine the Health Science Centre body donation programme $5 000 per day and revoke its operating licence if it didn’t come into compliance within 14 days.
North said the centre proactively halted water cremations on 16 September.
Dissecting the unclaimed
That was the same day that NBC News published an investigation revealing that the Health Science Centre had dissected and studied hundreds of unclaimed bodies without the consent of the dead or their families.
Many of them were cut up and leased to other schools, medical technology companies and the army, which used them to train students and doctors.
In response to the investigation, the centre suspended its body donation programme and fired the officials who ran it.
The Funeral Commission’s discovery raises new ethical and legal questions about the programme’s operations.
The Health Science Centre’s contracts with Dallas and Tarrant counties – which supplied it with unclaimed bodies – stipulated that human remains were to be cremated when the programme was finished with them.
And consent forms signed by those donating their bodies or the body of a relative to the centre also indicated that “cremated remains” would be returned to survivors – giving no indication that the bodies might instead be dissolved.
It’s possible families wouldn’t have detected the difference. The fine white powder produced by alkaline hydrolysis – made by pulverising bone fragments that are left behind after the rest of the body has been dissolved – resembles ashes.
Dallas and Tarrant county officials did not immediately respond to questions about whether they agreed to allow the Health Science Centre to liquefy unclaimed bodies.
Eli Shupe, a bioethicist at the University of Texas at Arlington who previously criticised the centre for dissecting unclaimed bodies, said she was shocked when she learned that the programme had been doing water cremations.
“This is a huge ethical issue,” she said. “It doesn’t seem as if they took the wishes of the families very seriously.”
North, the Health Science Centre spokesperson, did not answer questions about how long the programme had been doing water cremations, whether it used that method for all cases, or whether it disclosed that possibility to donors or their families.
Budget documents from 2020 show the Health Science Centre planned to install two alkaline hydrolysis units as part of a broader renovation to keep up with a surge in bodies coming into the programme, including unclaimed remains from Dallas and Tarrant counties.
Dissolving bodies in-house, instead of paying outside companies to cremate them, was expected to save the centre $1m over five years, the documents show.
Attempts to legalise water cremation have fallen short in the Texas Legislature in recent years in the face of opposition from religious groups, including the Texas Catholic Conference of Bishops, which has argued that the practice “fails to treat the body with dignity and respect”.
Critics were particularly incensed by the image of liquefied bodies being poured into the sewer.
Regardless of legality, Shupe said that if the Health Science Centre were doing water cremations without asking for permission, it would reveal a disregard for the wishes of the dead and their survivors.
“If my Catholic mother had donated her body to this programme, and I later learned that this is what had happened to her body, I would be sick,” she said. “I would be devastated. Because it’s not what she would have wanted.”
See more from MedicalBrief archives:
Conduct of French body donation centre under investigation
Dutch hospitals to stop using US body brokers