back to top
Tuesday, 17 September, 2024
HomeEthicsWhy liberal Switzerland is opposing Sarco suicide capsule

Why liberal Switzerland is opposing Sarco suicide capsule

The Sarco suicide capsule will soon be used for the first time in Switzerland, according to its makers, but authorities are resisting, and the device has yet to find favour with established right-to-die organisations.

The media hype is huge. Swiss outlets have been reporting on the suicide pod for almost all of July and many foreign media have also picked up the story. But after canton Schaffhausen threatened criminal prosecution, canton Valais has now also banned the use of Sarco.

Sarco, the 3D-printed capsule that enables a person to die within a few minutes at the touch of a button – peacefully, or even slightly euphorically, the inventor claims – was unveiled to the world five years ago. However, it has never been used.

Questions

This is now supposed to change, reports swissinfo.ch, after the capsule’s initiators recently held a press conference to correct “the misinformation circulating”.

At the event they announced the establishment of new organisation based in Switzerland called The Last Resort, which will oversee the roll-out of the capsule.

The new organisation’s founders did not reveal much, but confirmed they had contacted several cantons about deploying the capsule. No decision has apparently been made yet about where Sarco will be used.

In federal Switzerland, the cantons have far-reaching responsibilities, including for the health sector. However, whether the latter has jurisdiction over the capsule is not legally clear.

Fiona Stewart, founding member of the organisation, also did not disclose the name of the first person who wants to end their life with the capsule. “We really don’t want a person’s desire for a peaceful passing in Switzerland to turn into a media circus. It’s highly unethical.”

As for the timing of the launch, Stewart said it would be “this year”. Her co-president Florian Willet added that “it’s absolutely possible that within a couple of weeks or months someone will indeed be using the device”.*

How it works

Sarco was invented by Australian doctor and euthanasia advocate Philip Nitschke and Dutch engineer Alex Bannink. Nitschke founded the voluntary assisted-suicide organisation Exit International in Australia in 1997. It has no connection with the Swiss right-to-die organisation Exit.

Stewart is Nitschke’s life partner and is also involved in the activities of Exit International.

Sarco causes death through nitrogen hypoxia. After answering a few questions, the user presses a button in the capsule, whereupon a large amount of nitrogen is released, causing the oxygen level to drop from 21% to 0.05% in less than 30 seconds.

According to Nitschke, the person loses consciousness after two breaths and dies without suffering in around five minutes. The oxygen content in the capsule and the person’s heart rate can be monitored remotely, he told the media.

The capsule’s technical functioning capacity has been tested several times, for example, last year in Rotterdam in The Netherlands.

According to the organisation, people over 50 who are sound of mind will be able to use the Sarco capsule. It could, however, also be made available to younger people with incurable diseases. Unlike for Swiss assisted-dying organisations, no paid membership is required.

Supposedly liberal Switzerland

Nitschke chose Switzerland for his capsule because of the country’s comparatively liberal legal situation. Under Swiss law, helping another person to die is not a criminal offence as long as there is no selfish motive.

The professional association of Swiss doctors, the FMH, has also drawn up a code of ethics on assisted suicide. This states that healthy people should not be helped and that a doctor must conduct two consultations beforehand. However, the code is not legally binding.

As co-president Willet said at the press conference that thanks to its “wonderful liberal system”, Switzerland is “by far the best place (to roll out Sarco)”. His organisation is confident that Sarco can be used legally in Switzerland.

This, the organisation says, is because the capsule fulfils the three requirements for legal assisted dying: the users press the button themselves, they must have unclouded judgment, and the organisation providing Sarco has no self-serving motives.

“We have taken extensive legal advice over the past two years. It is our understanding that there is no legal impediment to Sarco being used,” Stewart said.

Legal grey area

In Valais, the cantonal doctor intervened against the use of the capsule there, arguing that the Swiss health regulator, Swissmedic, had not approved the capsule.

Swissmedic, however, does not consider itself responsible, as it does not currently classify Sarco as a medical device. “We have come to the conclusion that the intended purpose of a suicide capsule does not correspond to any specific medical purpose stated in the law. Bringing about death is not a treatment or alleviation of illness, injury or disability,” said Lukas Jaggi, spokesperson for Swissmedic, when contacted by SWI swissinfo.ch.

In canton Schaffhausen, the public prosecutor’s office had earlier threatened criminal prosecution, citing, among other things, the lack of information available about the capsule.

On this, Stewart commented at the media conference: “If there are different legal opinions, it will be a matter for the courts to decide.”

Right-to-die organisations worried

The established Swiss assisted-suicide organisations are all opposed to the capsule. The main reason is because The Last Resort wants to remove doctors from the process as much as possible.

Potential users of Sarco need a psychiatric report confirming their capacity for judgment. Otherwise, there is no medical intervention in the process. Nitrogen does not require a prescription and is freely available in Switzerland.

The Swiss model of assisted dying, which has been practised since the early 1980s, requires the involvement of a doctor. This is also the case in other countries where euthanasia is permitted, such as The Netherlands.

One reason is that sodium pentobarbital is used as a lethal drug in Switzerland. This must be prescribed by a doctor, which is why Swiss law requires conditions such as “suffering from an incurable illness”. Assisted suicide takes place after consultation with a doctor, if the doctor agrees.

Assisted suicide in the country

The assisted-suicide organisation Dignitas said that professional medical suicide assistance is practised by trained staff and that every accompanied suicide is checked by the authorities (public prosecutor’s office, police and medical officer).

“In light of this legally secured, established and proven practice, we cannot imagine that a technologised capsule for a self-determined end of life will meet much acceptance or interest in Switzerland,” Dignitas said.

According to Erika Preisig, a doctor and president of the Basel-based organisation Lifecircle, which helps patients to die, said medical intervention also serves as a “gatekeeper” to prevent unnecessary suicides.

“I fear that people without sufficient information about alternatives to suicide and who have not thought their death wish through carefully will be unscrupulously helped to die,” she said.

The Swiss organisations also describe Sarco as inhumane, as the person has to die “alone” in the closed capsule, separated from their relatives.

The oldest and largest euthanasia organisation in Switzerland, Exit, said its members and their relatives appreciate “not being separated from each other when dying, but being able to touch and hold each other during the last minutes if needed”.

The suicide capsule, which makes this final contact impossible, runs counter to Exit’s principles.

Some people also fear that Sarco could jeopardise the liberal Swiss assisted-dying system, or at least trigger regulations. “I’m starting to think that all assisted-suicide organisations should have an operating licence for Switzerland,” Preisig said. This would make cases such as the Sarco capsule impossible in the future.

* On 28 July, Exit International released a statement, saying the anticipated Sarco death of an American woman on 17 July had been permanently postponed. This followed “increasing concerns over her deteriorating mental health, especially given the latest instance of viral media about Sarco in Switzerland”.

 

Swissinfo.ch article – Why liberal Switzerland is opposed to the Sarco suicide capsule (Open access)

 

See more from MedicalBrief archives:

 

Euthanasia ‘pod’ ready for use, says inventor

 

Switzerland gives legal approval to suicide pod

 

The right to assisted suicide long overdue

 

 

 

 

MedicalBrief — our free weekly e-newsletter

We'd appreciate as much information as possible, however only an email address is required.