Assessing the actions taken to save Robert Kennedy after 1968 shooting

Organisation: Position: Deadline Date: Location:

USA. New York City. 1966. Portrait of Robert KENNEDY in his apartment.50 years after the assassination of US Senator Robert F Kennedy, a Duke University study assesses whether Kennedy could have survived if he were to be treated using 2018 medical techniques.

Struck by bullets on 5 June, 1968, following his victory speech at the California Democratic Party presidential primary, Kennedy died of severe brain injury on the following day, 6 June.

Although much has been written about RFK’s assassination – some documented and some speculative – to date there has been no detailed medical discussion of Kennedy’s injuries and treatment. An article by Dr Jordan M Komisarow, Dr Theodore Pappas, Dr Megan Llewellyn, and Dr Shivanand P Lad from Duke University School of Medicine addresses this subject.

The authors “review the eyewitness reports of the mechanism of injury, the care rendered for 3 hours prior to the emergency craniotomy, the clinical course, and, ultimately, the autopsy.” The discussion of autopsy findings is supplemented by an artist’s depiction of the extent of Senator Kennedy’s head injury.

Komisarow and colleagues provide a thorough review of clinical events from the time of the shooting until Kennedy’s death. They also discuss differences and similarities between 1968 and 2018 in the care of patients with gunshot wounds to the head.

Immediately following the shooting, multiple physicians converged at the scene to render assistance.

There was a delay of about 45 minutes in transporting Kennedy to the hospital best equipped to treat his severe wounds, due to a transport protocol in place at the time. Diagnostic tests that are commonplace today, such as computed tomography (CT) and CT angiography and venography, were not available. The surgical procedure performed in 1968, a craniotomy, however, was similar to what would be performed today. Some post-operative monitoring techniques and preferred medications have changed over the years.

Based on their analysis of medical records and testimony, Komisarow and colleagues believe that the steps taken by physicians to care for Kennedy in 1968 were in keeping with the standard medical practices of the day. An aggressive attempt was made to save him, but the outcome, given his serious head injury, was not unexpected.

Kennedy suffered “extensive injury to the right cerebellum and right occipital cortex.” There was damage to the brainstem and evidence of epidural, subdural, and subarachnoid haemorrhage. Bone and bullet fragments were embedded in tissue throughout the brain.

The authors point out that penetrating gunshot wounds to the head such as Kennedy’s are associated with a high mortality rate – one that has not changed much in the last 100 years, since the time of Harvey Cushing’s observations on penetrating head trauma conducted in 1918.

When asked whether Kennedy could have survived if he were to be treated using 2018 medical techniques, Komisarow responded: “By all accounts an aggressive and valiant effort was made to save the senator’s life. Unfortunately, a similar injury would likely also be fatal, or severely debilitating, in 2018.”

Lad added, “Despite numerous advances in imaging, anaesthesia, and surgical technique over the last 50 years, damage to the brainstem and its associated blood vessels continues to be a devastating and catastrophic injury.”

Abstract
On June 5, 1968, having won the Democratic Party presidential primary in California, Senator Robert F. Kennedy delivered a victory speech to supporters at the Ambassador Hotel in downtown Los Angeles. Just after 12:15 AM (Pacific daylight savings time), a lone assassin shot Kennedy three times at point-blank range. One of the bullets struck Kennedy in the right posterior auricular region. Within the ensuing 26 hours, Kennedy was transported to two hospitals, underwent emergency surgery, and eventually died of severe brain injury. Although this story has been repeated in the press and recounted in numerous books, this is the first analysis of the senator’s injuries and subsequent surgical care to be reported in the medical literature. The authors review eyewitness reports on the mechanism of injury, the care rendered for three hours prior to the emergency craniotomy, the clinical course, and, ultimately, the autopsy.

Authors
Jordan M Komisarow, Theodore Pappas, Megan Llewellyn, Shivanand P Lad

Journal of Neurosurgery Publishing Group material
Journal of Neurosurgery abstract


Receive Medical Brief's free weekly e-newsletter



Related Posts

Thank you for subscribing to MedicalBrief


MedicalBrief is Africa’s premier medical news and research weekly newsletter. MedicalBrief is published every Thursday and delivered free of charge by email to over 33 000 health professionals.

Please consider completing the form below. The information you supply is optional and will only be used to compile a demographic profile of our subscribers. Your personal details will never be shared with a third party.


Thank you for taking the time to complete the form.