Diverging national vaccination policies fuel public mistrust and hesitancy

Organisation: Position: Deadline Date: Location:

National divergences in vaccination policies may cause public trust in COVID-19 vaccines to wane and exacerbate existing hesitancy, write researchers from the London School of Economics and Political Science and the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, in The Lancet.

Correspondence from Rebecca Foreman, Mark Jit and Elias Mossialos was published in The Lancet on 1 June 2021. The correspondence runs below:

With reports of a possible risk of rare blood clots in people receiving AstraZeneca's COVID-19 vaccine (Vaxzevria), concerns have risen about its use in younger adults. As of 26 May 2021, country stances on the use of this vaccine generally fall into one of five response types.

Why countries continue to respond so differently in response to adverse events with this vaccine is unclear, but we are concerned that divergent vaccination policies could fuel mistrust and hesitancy around immunisation.

One response is to warn of potential risks, but otherwise no set restrictions on use of Vaxzevria. The European Medicines Agency and WHO have issued warnings about the rare possibility of blood clots within two weeks of vaccination.

While more data are being collected, the agencies encourage the continuation of the vaccine in all adults since current evidence suggests the benefits outweigh the risks. Many countries, including Poland, Mexico, and Brazil are following this guidance.

A second response is to not permit use. Denmark has decided to remove Vaxzevria from its vaccination programmes, whereas in Norway, further administration of the vaccine has been paused.

A third response is to advise that only older adults receive Vaxzevria; however, the age cut-off varies. In the Netherlands, Portugal, Singapore, and Spain the vaccine is given to adults aged 60 years and older, whereas in Belgium it is given to adults aged 55 years and older, and in Australia to those aged 50 years and older.

A fourth response is to encourage younger adults to accept a different type of COVID-19 vaccine if possible. Greece is encouraging adults younger than 30 years to take alternative vaccines to Vaxzevria. Similar recommendations exist in the United Kingdom and Pakistan for those younger than 40 years (in the UK, this age cut-off was recently increased from 30 years).

A fifth response is to use a mix-and-match approach for younger adults who have already received one dose of Vaxzevria. France and Germany have limited use of Vaxzevria to older adults and announced that those younger than 55 years (in France) and 60 years (in Germany) who received one dose of Vaxzevria should be given the vaccine produced by Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna for their second dose.

The divergent responses might reflect risk tolerance, the availability of alternative vaccinations, and whether safety calculations consider the risk of the vaccine and of the virus in conjunction.

Although some variation could be justified by the underlying risk-benefit calculations because of a country's age profile and its COVID-19 infection rates, we are concerned that public trust in vaccines will wane and exacerbate existing hesitancy because of these divergences.

In Europe, willingness to take the vaccine has already decreased after the temporary suspensions of Vaxzevria: between February and March, 2021, one survey found that respondents who believed the vaccine was unsafe increased by 18 percentage points in France (from 43% to 61%) and by 15 percentage points in Germany (from 40% to 55%).

Coordinated and strengthened risk communication efforts between regulatory agencies and policy makers could help improve the situation.

Governments should stress the safety and importance of vaccines and agree on common lines to explain adverse events that have occurred with the Vaxzevria vaccine and similar problems that are emerging with other non-replicating viral vector COVID-19 vaccines.

Communication from experts to the public should be transparent, simple and consistent. Statements about the risks associated with the vaccines should offer perspective, acknowledging the risks associated with COVID-19 and other common medications and substances, demonstrating how extremely rare these risks are, and referring to current evidence that the authorised vaccines are safe, effective and key to ending the pandemic.

* The authors declared no competing interests.

 

Vaccine hesitancy rose in EU after pause in AstraZeneca shots

Vaccine hesitancy increased in the European Union after the suspension of AstraZeneca Plc’s vaccine, with more than a third of adults in the bloc indicating they were unlikely to get immunised from COVID-19, wrote Todd Gillespie for Bloomberg on 13 May 2021.

After several EU countries suspended use of Astra’s shot in mid-March, 34% of respondents to an online survey by Eurofound said they were hesitant to take the vaccine. Before the pause, 25% said they were “rather unlikely” or “very unlikely” to get it.

“These findings reflect a failure to deliver persuasive and clear communication regarding the efficacy and safety of vaccines,” Daphne Ahrendt, senior research manager at Eurofound, said in a statement.

“Trust in vaccines is related to trust in institutions, and this is an issue primarily for policy-makers, but we also all have a collective responsibility, across society, to ensure that we communicate and publish accurate and sound information on the safety and importance of vaccines.”

The EU’s vaccine rollout got off to a slow start and was held back by concerns over rare blood clots possibly linked to Astra’s shot. The European Medicines Agency updated its guidance in April to include the condition as a possible side effect, but has said the vaccine’s benefits still outweigh its risks.

Almost 30% of the EU’s population has received at least one dose, compared with 46% in the United States, according to Bloomberg’s Vaccine Tracker.

In the entire period of Eurofound’s survey across February and March, the vaccine hesitancy figure was 27%. Scepticism was highest in Bulgaria, with 61% of survey participants indicating misgivings, and below 10% in Denmark, Malta and Ireland. The UK, which recently left the EU, has one of the lowest hesitancy rates in the world.

 

 

Correspondence in The Lancet – Divergent vaccination policies could fuel mistrust and hesitancy (Open access)

Bloomberg story – Vaccine Hesitancy Rose in EU After Pause in AstraZeneca Shots (Restricted access)

 

SEE ALSO FROM THE MEDICALBRIEF ARCHIVES

 

CDC investigates ‘relatively few’ reports of myocarditis from Pfizer vaccination

Cutaneous reactions to Moderna and Pfizer vaccination — Registry-based study

Workplaces join vaccination rollout effort

AstraZeneca struggles to get vaccine data together for US approval

AstraZeneca shoots itself in the foot, again

Political blows to AstraZeneca vaccine may boost vax hesitancy

 

 


Receive Medical Brief's free weekly e-newsletter



Related Posts

Thank you for subscribing to MedicalBrief


MedicalBrief is Africa’s premier medical news and research weekly newsletter. MedicalBrief is published every Thursday and delivered free of charge by email to over 33 000 health professionals.

Please consider completing the form below. The information you supply is optional and will only be used to compile a demographic profile of our subscribers. Your personal details will never be shared with a third party.


Thank you for taking the time to complete the form.