Military union threatens litigation over SANDF's vaccination failure

Organisation: Position: Deadline Date: Location:

The National Defence Union (SANDU) is threatening litigation against the South African National Defence Force (SANDF) to ensure speedy vaccines for its health workers, Beeld reports. It has emerged that the South African Military Health Services (SAMHS) is negotiating with China to procure vaccines.

The minutes of a SANDF meeting note that meetings have been held with the Chinese embassy, but no agreement is in place.

According to SANDU’s Pikkie Greeff, the surgeon-general initially undertook to provide vaccines by 15 March. “We have already sent two letters of demand to the surgeon-general, but he is not responding.” SANDU has therefore decided to approach the courts on an urgent basis next week.

 

Groundup had earlier reported that health workers in the military have had no vaccinations against COVID-19 since the programme to vaccinate public and private health workers began in mid-February.

Groundup reports that in a document dated 17 March, a military medical worker put in a formal request to be included in the Sisonke programme. The person is, according to the document, in direct contact with COVID-19 patients. The request was denied by a very senior officer and it was stated that not a single military medical health worker is permitted to go outside the department of defence for a vaccine.

The report says early in March, SANDU threatened legal action if health workers in the military were not included in the Sisonke Vaccination Programme by 8 March. They are now calling for the resignation of the surgeon-general.

Groundup reports that the South African Medical Association (SAMA) received numerous queries regarding COVID-19 vaccinations for healthcare workers of the SAMHS. Surgeon General Lieutenant-General Zola Dabula assured SAMA that all health professionals, regardless of whether they are civilian or permanent force members, will be vaccinated through the SAMHS.

The union then agreed to withdraw its threat of legal action.

The military gave the assurance on 5 March that vaccinations would start mid-March at approved sites and the surgeon general was inspecting these to accredit them. Greeff is quoted in Groundup as saying on 23 March that it will seek an urgent court order if nothing is forthcoming. “The military authorities are endangering its own forces by failing to vaccinate its health workers. Endangering (your) own forces is a criminal offence. The surgeon general should resign immediately,” said Greeff.

Griesel Breytenbach attorneys, acting on behalf of SANDU, wrote to the Minister of Defence, the Secretary of Defence, and the Chief of the SANDF on 19 March, stating that the undertakings made by Dabula earlier in March have not materialised and demanding the vaccinations of military health workers proceed.

If there is no response the union will approach the High Court in Pretoria for “urgent relief” the attorneys wrote.

Groundup reports that another document it has seen, dated 23 February, documents the rollout plan of SAMHS. But which vaccine the military wants to give its health workers, where, and how it plans to obtain them is not mentioned. It is clear from the document the SAMHS plans to vaccinate its own staff and handle the process from beginning to end.

Senior officers of SAMHS were meant to submit plans to the chairperson of the SAMHS vaccine roll out co-ordinating committee by 1 March. However, when assessing the 14-page document, the aims are there, but not the actual plans. It is a “to do list”.

SAMA said it understands the SAMHS is negotiating with Sinopharm, a Chinese company, through the relevant military organisations to bring the vaccines into the country as a second choice, indicating that it has already applied to the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA).

SAMA points out that companies who are authorised to import products must be holders of a Section 22C Licence to do so.

But, Groundup reports, the national Health Department is the only procurer of vaccines – for both the public and private sector. It has indicated its second choice is the Pfizer vaccine.

“We would suggest that SAMHS has a parallel discussion with Dr Anban Pillay from the National Health Department about how this could be arranged as part of the national phased prioritised rollout, as health workers in SAMHS should be accessing the J&J vaccine now through the (Sisonke study),” notes Dr Angelique Coetzee, chair of SAMA.

Groundup reports that the SANDF has not responded to questions.

 

Full Beeld report (Restricted access)

Full Groundup report (Open access)


Receive Medical Brief's free weekly e-newsletter



Related Posts

Thank you for subscribing to MedicalBrief


MedicalBrief is Africa’s premier medical news and research weekly newsletter. MedicalBrief is published every Thursday and delivered free of charge by email to over 33 000 health professionals.

Please consider completing the form below. The information you supply is optional and will only be used to compile a demographic profile of our subscribers. Your personal details will never be shared with a third party.


Thank you for taking the time to complete the form.