Emergency HIV testing effective in identifying patients currently missed

Organisation: Position: Deadline Date: Location:

A non-targeted testing approached by the emergency department in a South African hospital revealed a high HIV prevalence with a significant burden of undiagnosed HIV infection.

South Africa has the worst epidemic of HIV in the world. According to the Joint UN Programme on HIV/AIDS, 19% of the global number of people living with HIV are in South Africa. Many people in South Africa and around the globe do not even know they have HIV.

Researchers at Johns Hopkins set out to quantify the burden of undiagnosed HIV infection in a South African emergency department and to evaluate the effectiveness of HIV testing in such a setting. The study was conducted during a three-month period in 2016 at Frere Hospital in the Eastern Cape.

“This is a low resource area without electronic medical records or a patient track board to monitor patient status, and thus conducting research here is inherently difficult. Furthermore, patients come from a 60-mile radius and there are challenges to providing follow-up care,” says Dr Bhakti Hansoti, assistant professor of emergency medicine at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine. “In many low resource settings, the emergency department is a safety net for patients who are often missed by the health system.” In doing this study, they captured a high volume of this unique and vulnerable patient population, she adds.

A total of 2,355 emergency department (ED) patients, most of whom presented to the ED due to a trauma injury, were approached by staff to receive HIV testing. Almost 73% of those patients accepted HIV testing. About 22%, or 400 patients, were HIV positive, including 115 patients, or about 6%, who were newly diagnosed with HIV infection.

Researchers found the overall prevalence of HIV infection was twice as high in females compared to males, with about one in every three women having HIV.

“As a region, the Eastern Cape has one of the highest rates of HIV infection in the world,” says Dr Thomas Quinn, professor of medicine at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and the senior author of the paper. “This particular study is the first to document the full magnitude of HIV infection in the region, and the eagerness of the people to know whether they are infected with HIV. The government provides access to treatment, making diagnosis a critical component of care.”

As part of the research, Hansoti and research team members educated lay and clinical staff at the hospital on the importance of the study and HIV testing, and trained them to approach patients, administer testing and assist in recording findings. However, despite counsellors providing testing services 24 hours a day at the hospital, counsellors were only able to approach about one in four of the patients who came to the ED due to the time-consuming nature of the HIV testing process. Further innovation, such as HIV patient self-testing, and implementation research is necessary to develop a sustainable testing strategy for the clinical environment so that service delivery in the ED can be improved, the study authors say.

However, both Quinn and Hansoti hope HIV testing will become commonplace in low resource emergency care settings. “We’re transitioning emergency care from a service focused only on stabilisation and resuscitation to a health care venue that helps a difficult-to-reach population with preventative care and surveillance, such as HIV testing,” Hansoti says. “It’s time for a major paradigm shift for many hospitals and health systems as we define the role of emergency care in low resource environments.”

Additional authors on the study include David Stead and Andy Parrish of Walter Sisulu University and Frere and Cecilia Makiwane Hospitals in South Africa; Steven J Reynolds, Andrew D Redd and Madeleine M Whalen of the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine; and Nomzamo Mvandaba of Walter Sisulu University.

Research was supported by the South African Medical Research Council and, in part, by the division of intramural research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health.

Background: South Africa has the largest HIV epidemic in the world, with 19% of the global number of people living with HIV, 15% of new infections and 11% of AIDS-related deaths. Even though HIV testing is mandated in all hospital-based facilities in South Africa (SA), it is rarely implemented in the Emergency Department (ED). The ED provides episodic care to large volumes of undifferentiated who present with unplanned injury or illness. Thus, the ED may provide an opportunity to capture patients with undiagnosed HIV infection missed by clinic-based screening programs.
Methods and findings: In this prospective exploratory study, we implemented the National South African HIV testing guidelines (counselor initiated non-targeted universal screening with rapid point of care testing) for 24-hours a day at Frere Hospital in the Eastern Cape from September 1st to November 30th, 2016. The purpose of our study was to quantify the burden of undiagnosed HIV infection in a South African ED setting. Furthermore, we sought to evaluate the effectiveness of the nationally recommended HIV testing strategy in the ED. All patients who presented for care in the ED during the study period, and who were clinically stable and fully conscious, were eligible to be approached by HIV counseling and testing (HCT) staff to receive a rapid point-of-care HIV test. A total of 2355 of the 9583 (24.6%) patients who presented to the ED for care during the study period were approached by the HCT staff, of whom 1714 (72.8%) accepted HIV testing. There was a high uptake of HIV testing (78.6%) among a predominantly male (58%) patient group who mostly presented with traumatic injuries (70.8%). Four hundred (21.6%) patients were HIV positive, including 115 (6.2%) with newly diagnosed HIV infection. The overall prevalence of HIV infection was twice as high in females (29.8%) compared to males (15.4%). Both sexes had a similar prevalence of newly diagnosed HIV infection (6.0% for all females and 6.4% for all males) in the ED.
Conclusions: Overall there was high HIV testing acceptance by ED patients. A non-targeted testing approached revealed a high HIV prevalence with a significant burden of undiagnosed HIV infection in the ED. Unfortunately, a counselor-driven HIV testing approach fell short of meeting the testing needs in this setting, with over 75% of ED patients not approached by HCT staff.

Bhakti Hansoti, David Stead, Andy Parrish, Steven J Reynolds, Andrew D Redd, Madeleine M Whalen, Nomzamo Mvandaba, Thomas C Quinn


PLOS ONE abstract

Receive Medical Brief's free weekly e-newsletter

Related Posts

Thank you for subscribing to MedicalBrief

MedicalBrief is Africa’s premier medical news and research weekly newsletter. MedicalBrief is published every Thursday and delivered free of charge by email to over 33 000 health professionals.

Please consider completing the form below. The information you supply is optional and will only be used to compile a demographic profile of our subscribers. Your personal details will never be shared with a third party.

Thank you for taking the time to complete the form.