Measuring biological age by tracking DNA changes through an epigenetic clock, a Yale study stress does indeed make life’s clock tick faster, but people can help manage the effects by strengthening their emotion regulation and self-control.
So-called “epigenetic clocks” have proved to be better predictors of lifespan and health than chronological age. In a recent study, researchers used one such clock, appropriately named “GrimAge”, to ask two questions: how much does chronic stress accelerate that biological clock? And are there ways to slow it down and extend a healthy lifespan?
According to their findings, published in the journal Translational Psychiatry, stress does indeed make life’s clock tick faster, but people can help manage the effects by strengthening their emotion regulation and self-control.
Rajita Sinha, the Foundations Fund professor of psychiatry at Yale, a professor of neuroscience and professor at the Yale Child Study Center, and one of the authors of the study, has spent decades studying stress and the myriad and pernicious ways it erodes our mental and physical health.
Prolonged stress, for instance, increases the risk of heart disease, addiction, mood disorders, and post-traumatic stress disorder, said Sinha, who is also director of the Yale Interdisciplinary Stress Center. It can influence metabolism, accelerating obesity-related disorders such as diabetes. Stress also saps our ability to regulate emotions and to think clearly.
A Yale team led by Sinha and Zachary Harvanek, a resident in the Yale Department of Psychiatry, decided to explore whether stress also accelerates ageing in a relatively young and healthy population. Other co-authors included Ke Xu, an associate professor of psychiatry, and Nia Fogelman, an associate research scientist in psychiatry at Yale.
For their study, they enrolled 444 people, aged 19 to 50, who provided blood samples used to evaluate the age-related chemical changes captured by GrimAge as well as other markers of health. The participants also answered questions designed to reveal stress levels and psychological resilience.
Even after accounting for demographic and behavioural factors such as smoking, body mass index, race, and income, the researchers found that those who scored high on measures related to chronic stress exhibited accelerated ageing markers and physiological changes, such as increased insulin resistance.
However, stress didn’t affect everyone's health to the same degree. Subjects who scored high on two psychological resilience measures (emotion regulation and self-control) were more resilient to the effects of stress on ageing and insulin resistance, respectively. “These results support the popular notion that stress makes us age faster,” Harvanek said, “but they also suggest a promising way to possibly minimiae these adverse consequences of stress through strengthening emotion regulation and self-control.”
In other words, the more psychologically resilient the subject, the higher the likelihood they would live a longer and healthier life, he said.
“We all like to feel as if we have some agency over our fate,” Sinha said. “So it is a cool thing to reinforce in people’s minds that we should make an investment in our psychological health.”
Psychological and biological resilience modulates the effects of stress on epigenetic aging
Zachary M. Harvanek, Nia Fogelman, Ke Xu, Rajita Sinha.
Published in Translational Psychiatry on 17 November 2021
Our society is experiencing more stress than ever before, leading to both negative psychiatric and physical outcomes. Chronic stress is linked to negative long-term health consequences, raising the possibility that stress is related to accelerated aging. In this study, we examine whether resilience factors affect stress-associated biological age acceleration.
Recently developed “epigenetic clocks” such as GrimAge have shown utility in predicting biological age and mortality. Here, we assessed the impact of cumulative stress, stress physiology, and resilience on accelerated aging in a community sample (N = 444). Cumulative stress was associated with accelerated GrimAge (P = 0.0388) and stress-related physiologic measures of adrenal sensitivity (Cortisol/ACTH ratio) and insulin resistance (HOMA). After controlling for demographic and behavioural factors, HOMA correlated with accelerated GrimAge (P = 0.0186). Remarkably, psychological resilience factors of emotion regulation and self-control moderated these relationships. Emotion regulation moderated the association between stress and ageing (P = 8.82e−4) such that with worse emotion regulation, there was greater stress-related age acceleration, while stronger emotion regulation prevented any significant effect of stress on GrimAge.
Self-control moderated the relationship between stress and insulin resistance (P = 0.00732), with high self-control blunting this relationship. In the final model, in those with poor emotion regulation, cumulative stress continued to predict additional GrimAge Acceleration even while accounting for demographic, physiologic, and behavioural covariates.
These results demonstrate that cumulative stress is associated with epigenetic ageing in a healthy population, and these associations are modified by biobehavioral resilience factors.
See more from MedicalBrief archives: