back to top
Wednesday, 30 April, 2025
HomeCoronavirusLab leak mistake most likely source of Covid, says UK expert

Lab leak mistake most likely source of Covid, says UK expert

Covid more than likely came from a laboratory leak in China, the British professor behind a virus symptom tracker has said, adding that it was probably more a mistake than a deliberate move.

Professor Tim Spector, who helped create the Zoe symptom tracker app and was awarded an OBE for services in the Covid-19 response, told a podcast that it was “obvious” there had been a cover-up about the origins of the pandemic, reports The Telegraph.

The virus emerged near the Wuhan Institute of Virology in December 2019, where scientists had been experimenting with bat coronaviruses.

Claims that the virus may have leaked from the lab were dismissed by some scientists as a conspiracy theory.

Speaking on the Zoe podcast, Spector, a professor of genetic epidemiology at King’s College London – and who was an adviser to Downing Street during the pandemic – said: “I don’t think there’s any doubt that this virus emanated in China, in a place near Wuhan.

“The question is, did this come from bats? Did it come from a lab that was working on this virus and manipulating it to make it grow faster? Or was it a totally artificially generated virus to cause harm that they then didn’t control?

“The initial ideas and the government’s official response was that this was related to bats and was a natural phenomenon that came out of this market in Wuhan.

“It’s looking increasingly as if that were a bit of a cover-up and that the most likely source of this was a lab leak from Wuhan.”

He pointed to congressional hearings in the US that heard there had been collaborations between US and Chinese labs to study the infectiousness of coronaviruses and to look at how to “control them or speed them up”.

“That seems to be the most likely scientific answer for what went on … that explains both the epidemiology, the timing,” he said.

“Also, the trail of shredded documents and email exchange between the US and China at the time. And also … there was a very obvious cover-up early on by various governments saying ‘we have to get a report out there … saying this is all down to bats so people aren’t going to blame labs and scientists’ to keep that credibility going.

“That’s my personal view and there are views on all sides of this.

“I don’t think the idea that someone built a virus from scratch would be very easy to do. So I think it’s more likely it was a mistake rather than anything deliberate, but I think these were people working with hazardous viruses that got out of control, rather than it being a plot.”

The Wuhan Institute of Virology had embarked on “gain of function experiments” in 2010, to increase the infectiousness of the SARS (severe acute respiratory syndrome) coronavirus in humans.

By 2015, they had created a highly infectious chimeric virus that targeted the human upper respiratory tract.

In 2018 and 2019, grants from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases in the US showed that Dr Shi Zhengli had applied to work on “virus infection experiments in humanised mice” using SARS coronaviruses to find out what changes could lead to a spillover event into humans.

Alina Chan, a scientist at Harvard, told MPs at the House of Commons Science & Technology Select Committee: “You find these scientists who said in early 2018: ‘I’m going to put horns on horses,’ and at the end of 2019 a unicorn turns up in Wuhan city.”

Freedom of information requests revealed Wuhan researchers collected bat coronaviruses from China and south-east Asia.

These were sent to various laboratories hundreds of miles away for “sequencing”, “archiving”, “analysis” and “manipulation”. WIV had collected more than 220 SARS-related coronaviruses, at least 100 of which were never made public.

Staff were also photographed wearing inadequate levels of personal protective equipment while handing bats.

Last year, the WIV was stripped of US funding for 10 years for conducting dangerous experiments, which increased the potency of coronaviruses before the pandemic.

Spector said the case had shown that labs across the world should face more oversight and be treated with the same seriousness as a nuclear threat.

“If that is the most likely solution, well. that could happen again in another lab if we’re not careful,” he added.

 

The Telegraph article – Lab leak most likely source of Covid, says Prof Tim Spector (Restricted access)

 

See more from MedicalBrief archives:

 

Antarctic find fuels theory of accidental COVID leak from research lab

 

Biden shuts down US State efforts to find a Wuhan lab leak

 

COVID-19 Wuhan lab escape theory gets a second look

 

Inquiry into COVID-19’s Chinese origins ‘must be independent’ of WHO — Open letter

 

 

 

 

MedicalBrief — our free weekly e-newsletter

We'd appreciate as much information as possible, however only an email address is required.